Advertisement

Sociodemographic Factors Influencing Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Presentation and Outcome

Published:August 05, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2020.08.001

      Purpose

      The impact of sociodemographic factors on the presentation and outcomes of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) in the United States has not been described. We analyzed the impact of these factors on the presenting fovea-on or off status of RRD, single operation anatomic success (SOAS) of repair, and postoperative visual acuity (VA).

      Design

      Retrospective, single-center, cohort study.

      Participants

      Participants included 4061 patients from Wills Eye Hospital/Mid Atlantic Retina from February 2015 to February 2020.

      Methods

      Sociodemographic factors including age, gender, race, and regional mean household income (MHI) as determined by ZIP code were recorded. The VA at baseline and 12 months post-RRD repair was recorded. Multiple regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between sociodemographic factors to fovea-on or off presentation of RRD, SOAS, and 12-month VA.

      Main Outcome Measures

      Foveal attachment at presentation of RRD, SOAS, and 12-month VA.

      Results

      Older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.34 per decade, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27–1.41, P < 0.001), male gender (OR, 1.27, 95% CI, 1.11–1.45, P < 0.001), non-White race (OR, 2.41, 95% CI, 1.92–3.03, P < 0.001), and lower MHI (OR, 0.94 per $10 000, 95% CI, 0.91–0.98, P = 0.005) were independent risk factors for fovea-off presentation of RD. The need for reoperation to repair RRD within 90 days was independently associated with fovea-off presentation (OR, 1.47, 95% CI, 1.24–1.74, P < 0.001) and non-White race (OR, 1.72, 95% CI, 1.27–2.39, P < 0.001). Finally, 12-month postoperative VA was worse in patients who were fovea-off (P < 0.001), older (P = 0.041), male (P = 0.038), and non-White (P = 0.007) but was not related to MHI (P = 0.24).

      Conclusions

      These findings reveal associations between the sociodemographic factors and the presentation and outcomes of RRD. Physicians should be aware that socioeconomic disparities can negatively impact the prognosis of patients with RRD. Further study confirming these findings and efforts to mitigate their effects are warranted and will be of interest to the greater ophthalmology community.

      Keywords

      Abbreviations and Acronyms:

      CI (confidence interval), logMAR (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution), MHI (mean household income), OR (odds ratio), RRD (rhegmatogenous retinal detachment), SB (scleral buckle), SES (socioeconomic status), SOAS (single operation anatomic success), VA (visual acuity)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      Subscribe to Ophthalmology Retina
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Chou C.-F.
        • Barker L.E.
        • Crews J.E.
        • et al.
        Disparities in eye care utilization among the United States adults with visual impairment: findings from the behavioral risk factor surveillance system 2006-2009.
        Am J Ophthalmol. 2012; 154: S45-52.e1
        • Zhang X.
        • Beckles G.L.
        • Chou C.-F.
        • et al.
        Socioeconomic disparity in use of eye care services among US adults with age-related eye diseases: National Health Interview Survey, 2002 and 2008.
        JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013; 131: 1198-1206
        • Wilson M.R.
        Racial disparities in vision impairment and blindness: causes and future research direction.
        Ophthalmology. 2001; 108: 1719-1720
        • Alasil T.
        • Munoz N.
        • Keane P.A.
        • et al.
        Characteristics and racial variations of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy in tertiary centers in the United States and United Kingdom.
        Int J Retina Vitreous. 2017; 3: 9
        • Jiang S.
        • Mikhail M.
        • Slomovic J.
        • et al.
        Prevalence and impact of eye disease in an urban homeless and marginally housed population.
        Can J Ophthalmol. 2020; 55: 76-81
        • Luo H.
        • Bell R.A.
        • Garg S.
        • et al.
        Trends and racial/ethnic disparities in diabetic retinopathy among adults with diagnosed diabetes in North Carolina, 2000-2015.
        N C Med J. 2019; 80: 76-82
        • Stein J.D.
        • Kim D.S.
        • Niziol L.M.
        • et al.
        Differences in rates of glaucoma among Asian Americans and other racial groups, and among various Asian ethnic groups.
        Ophthalmology. 2011; 118: 1031-1037
        • Rajeshuni N.
        • Whittemore A.S.
        • Ludwig C.A.
        • et al.
        Racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in retinoblastoma enucleation: a population-based study, SEER 18 2000-2014.
        Am J Ophthalmol. 2019; 207: 215-223
        • Ehrlich J.R.
        • Stagg B.C.
        • Andrews C.
        • et al.
        Vision impairment and receipt of eye care among older adults in low- and middle-income countries.
        JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019; 137: 146-158
        • Ng W.S.
        • Agarwal P.K.
        • Sidiki S.
        • et al.
        The effect of socio-economic deprivation on severity of glaucoma at presentation.
        Br J Ophthalmol. 2010; 94: 85-87
        • Ko Y.C.
        • Hwang D.K.
        • Chen W.T.
        • et al.
        Impact of socioeconomic status on the diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma and primary angle closure glaucoma: a nationwide population-based study in Taiwan.
        PLoS One. 2016; 11e0149698
        • Acharya N.
        • Lois N.
        • Townend J.
        • et al.
        Socio-economic deprivation and visual acuity at presentation in exudative age-related macular degeneration.
        Br J Ophthalmol. 2009; 93: 627-629
        • Patel S.N.
        • Wu C.
        • Obeid A.
        • et al.
        Sociodemographic factors in neovascular age-related macular degeneration.
        Ophthalmology. 2020; 127: 280-282
        • Denniston A.K.
        • Lee A.Y.
        • Lee C.S.
        • et al.
        United Kingdom Diabetic Retinopathy Electronic Medical Record (UK DR EMR) Users Group: report 4, real-world data on the impact of deprivation on the presentation of diabetic eye disease at hospital services.
        Br J Ophthalmol. 2019; 103: 837-843
        • Sharma A.
        • Wong A.M.F.
        • Colpa L.
        • et al.
        Socioeconomic status and utilization of amblyopia services at a tertiary pediatric hospital in Canada.
        Can J Ophthalmol. 2016; 51: 452-458
        • Qiu M.
        • Wang S.Y.
        • Singh K.
        • Lin S.C.
        Racial disparities in uncorrected and undercorrected refractive error in the United States.
        Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014; 55: 6996-7005
        • Nam G.E.
        • Han K.
        • Ha S.G.
        • et al.
        Relationship between socioeconomic and lifestyle factors and cataracts in Koreans: The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2008–2011.
        Eye. 2015; 29: 913-920
        • Mundy K.M.
        • Nichols E.
        • Lindsey J.
        Socioeconomic disparities in cataract prevalence, characteristics, and management.
        Semin Ophthalmol. 2016; 31: 358-363
        • Herren D.J.
        • Kohanim S.
        Disparities in vision loss due to cataracts in Hispanic women in the United States.
        Semin Ophthalmol. 2016; 31: 353-357
        • Chang J.S.
        • Smiddy W.E.
        Cost-effectiveness of retinal detachment repair.
        Ophthalmology. 2014; 121: 946-951
        • Rezar S.
        • Sacu S.
        • Blum R.
        • et al.
        Macula-on versus macula-off pseudophakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment following primary 23-gauge vitrectomy plus endotamponade.
        Curr Eye Res. 2015; : 1-8
        • Pastor J.C.
        • Fernandez I.
        • de la Rua E.R.
        • et al.
        Surgical outcomes for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachments in phakic and pseudophakic patients: the Retina 1 Project--report 2.
        Br J Ophthalmol. 2008; 92: 378-382
        • Gupta O.P.
        • Benson W.E.
        The risk of fellow eyes in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.
        Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2005; 16: 175-178
        • Holladay J.T.
        Proper method for calculating average visual acuity.
        J Refract Surg. 1997; 13: 4
        • Schulze-Bonsel K.
        • Feltgen N.
        • Burau H.
        • et al.
        Visual acuities “hand motion” and “counting fingers” can be quantified with the Freiburg visual acuity test.
        Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006; 47: 1236-1240
        • Finn A.P.
        • Eliott D.
        • Kim L.A.
        • et al.
        Characteristics and outcomes of simultaneous bilateral rhegmatogenous retinal detachments.
        Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2016; 47: 840-845
        • US Census Bureau
        About Race. The United States Census Bureau.
        • Adler N.E.
        • Newman K.
        Socioeconomic disparities in health: pathways and policies.
        Health Aff. 2002; 21: 60-76
        • Mitry D.
        • Charteris D.G.
        • Yorston D.
        • et al.
        The epidemiology and socioeconomic associations of retinal detachment in Scotland: a two-year prospective population-based study.
        Invest Opthalmol Vis Sci. 2010; 51: 4963
        • Saidkasimova S.
        • Mitry D.
        • Singh J.
        • et al.
        Retinal detachment in Scotland is associated with affluence.
        Br J Ophthalmol. 2009; 93: 1591-1594
        • Allbon D.S.
        • Avery N.
        • Gray A.
        • Bradshaw H.
        Retinal detachments in southern New Zealand: do poorer patients have poorer outcomes?.
        N Z Med J. 2015; 128: 18-24
        • Poulsen C.D.
        • Peto T.
        • Grauslund J.
        • Green A.
        Epidemiologic characteristics of retinal detachment surgery at a specialized unit in Denmark.
        Acta Ophthalmologica. 2016; 94: 548-555
        • Hwang J.
        • Rudnisky C.
        • Bowen S.
        • Johnson J.A.
        Socioeconomic factors associated with visual impairment and ophthalmic care utilization in patients with type II diabetes.
        Can J Ophthalmol. 2015; 50: 119-126
        • Hwang J.
        • Rudnisky C.
        • Bowen S.
        • Johnson J.A.
        Measuring socioeconomic inequalities in eye care services among patients with diabetes in Alberta, Canada, 1995-2009.
        Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017; 127: 205-211
        • Ehrlich J.R.
        • Ndukwe T.
        • Solway E.
        • et al.
        Self-reported eye care use among US adults aged 50 to 80 years.
        JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019; 137: 1061-1066
        • Burton T.C.
        Recovery of visual acuity after retinal detachment involving the macula.
        Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1982; 80: 475-497